Borysenko-2017

 

Popular posts from this blog

Foreword

Image
This is a story about how I am trying to gain the right to publish the results of my own long-term scientific research. My results… were stolen and published by other people. Influential people. The situation is unpleasant, but in a civilized society, it is not hopeless: the guilty parties are quickly punished and branded as thieves for the rest of their scientific careers, justice prevails, and the result of the work returns to the author. In Ukraine, this does not work at all or works differently. What has happened and is still happening can be read on this website. Today marks the th day since I have been unable to publish the results of my own years-long work. My research : view   here , download here , on Researchgate here The article that plagiarized my research :  view here ; download here ; view on the journal's web-archived site here Start by reading  On Culture and Barbarism (all es...
Read more

On Culture and Barbarism

Image
The theft of a Master's Thesis – a new peak in national plagiarism thought.  Students often plagiarize the works of their professors, but could plagiarism work in the opposite direction, with a professor stealing from a student? It turns out that for our plagiarists, nothing is impossible. Let me introduce you to the latest domestic "innovation." The  professors and thieves are Ivan Vasylovych Danyliuk , Dean of the Faculty of Psychology at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv and Doctor of Psychological Sciences, along with two of his subordinates: Inna Valeriivna Kozytska, Head of the Department of Experimental Psychology, and Serhii Oleksandrovych Shykovets, a postgraduate student:      In October 2017, I defended my master's thesis, titled “The Structure of the Cultural Syndrome ‘Individualism-Collectivism’ in Ukraine,” at the same university.  The chair of the examination committee was Ivan Danyliuk, a well-known Ukrainian ethnopsychologist. U...
Read more

Why I Burned My University Diploma

Image
Ukrainian science is not quite science in the universal sense. It is a fragment of Soviet science, which was based not on truth but on authority and connections. Soviet academicians, like general secretaries, were only removed from their offices feet first. Anything the state needed could become "science"—for example, electric welding or various kinds of humanitarian and philosophical nonsense. But anything that did not fit into the state ideology, such as genetics, was not considered science at all. The largest number of scientific articles in history was published by such Soviet scientists.   In my early years, I worked under the leadership of a director of a National Academy of Sciences institute. I never saw him conduct any research. Yet, he was constantly publishing in a journal (in which he was the editor-in-chief)—always as the first author. He had no real understanding of how science worked beyond the walls of his own institute. There is nothing wrong with an older sc...
Read more