The History of a Plagiarism Case

  Did your head not start spinning after reading the section about the administrative courts? Brace yourself—those were just the warm-up acts. The administrative nightmare that has dragged on for three years, with no end in sight, is merely the prelude to the real hell: the civil court. Since the summer of 2022—three full years now—the civil case has been stuck at the preparatory stage. The defendants, represented by well-fed, well-paid lawyers, have spent these three years doing nothing more than “familiarizing themselves” with the case materials. Meanwhile, not a single one of my own motions to access the case file has even been considered. It is an absurdity beyond explanation—so wildly at odds with any normal human understanding of how justice should function. Out of the dozen motions I have submitted over the years (not counting another dozen requesting access to the case file, which will likely never be reviewed), only two were ever addressed. The rest did not begin to be con...

  My correspondence with Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (KNU) and the Ministry of Education and Science (MES) concerned holding Danyliuk and his associates accountable for plagiarism. The main milestones of this correspondence are presented in the article  On culture and barbarism . Here, you can find more detailed information and updates. I apologize in advance that all documents are presented without translation into English — translating official documents is an extremely time-consuming task, and I simply do not have enough time and energy for it!  16.04.2022  - Filed a  complaint  with KNU requesting an investigation of the plagiarism case and the imposition of disciplinary sanctions on the plagiarists; submitted a similar  complaint  to MES. 20.04.2022  - Received a bureaucratic  response  from the MES: they simply forwarded my complaint to KNU. 06.06.2022  - Sent a follow-up  request  to KNU, ...